General Topics



This time of the year when there is a tendency to glorify the Hasmoneans as Jewish tough guys, it is appropriate that two Jewish boxers have just hit the news. Both are Russian Jews and both are newly religious under the influence of Lubavitch. Yuri Foreman of Brooklyn, but of Israeli citizenship, surprisingly defeated champion Puerto Rican Daniel Santos in Las Vegas to win the World Boxing Association 154-pound title. On the other hand, the previously unbeaten Jewish boxer, Dmitriy Salita, was less surprisingly knocked out by Muslim fighter Amir Khan from Britain in just 76 seconds. Should we be proud, sad, or what?

Thousands of years of subservience in exile have given us Jews a reputation for being weaklings and softies. It is not altogether fair. There have been great Jewish boxers such as Daniel Mendoza, England’s sixteenth Heavyweight Champion from 1792 to 1795. American Maximilian Adelbert “Madcap Maxie” Baer was briefly Heavyweight Champion of the world. In fact, the Boxing Hall of Fame lists over sixty Jewish boxers. Jewish mercenaries were known to be amongst the best in the Roman Empire (I wonder if they took breaks over Shabbat?) And of course we have in our lifetime had Israeli war heroes, and now everyone accuses us of being brutal tough guys.

Still, it is true we have tended to prefer the book to the sword and Nobel Prizes to boxing belts (though I’m not sure that some Nobel Prizes, particularly those outside the objective realms of science, haven’t completely lost their luster).

But I hate boxing. It is a brutal sport in which you simply try to smash your opponent into submission, doing as much physical damage as you possibly can. The nadir of boxing was the ghastly specter of Mike Tyson biting the ear of Evander Holyfield. If you have seen the film Tyson, you have seen a world champion decline from brute to pathetic. Nothing is sadder that seeing the once arrogant Muhammad Ali reduced to invalidity.

It is usually the very poor or the disposed who venture into a sport that batters their bodies and minds into mush in the hope of making a lot of money before that happens. But more often than not crooked promoters filch most of it. The boxing world is an unsavory demimonde of crooks, charlatans, and punters, with a few dedicated trainers on the side. The audience at a boxing match is usually made of screaming frustrated women, neanderthal toughs spitting hatred and invective of the most racial kind, regardless of color, and so-called celebrities who have nothing better to do with their time. It recalls the Roman gladiatorial games and the crude bloodlust of primitive people. Yes, there have been noble fighters, but watching boxing brings out the worst in a person. Although I like seeing excellence in sport, it brings out the worst in me, too.

In other words, boxing is a sport in which you know you will be dealing with the dregs of humanity. So it was surprising that, in explaining his defeat, Salita told the (London) Jewish Chronicle, “It was over before it started. I was in great shape and well prepared but the anti-Semitic chanting left me completely overwhelmed. . .The experience of fighting away from home, and the crowd being so against me, left me shocked.”

The article states, “Rabbi Dovid Lewis, of Newcastle United Hebrew Congregation, accompanied Salita, wearing his traditional Magen David-decorated shorts, from his dressing room to the ring. He said, ‘We were shocked at the vitriolic abuse shouted at Dmitriy. It was anti-Semitic swearing and spitting with a lot of pushing and pulling.'”

Now initially one might react by saying that this is just symptomatic of the reaction to anything Israeli in European life. On any BBC current affairs or discussion program a person expressing any pro-Israeli sentiment will be booed, heckled, and harassed by the audience. At demonstrations there is no rational engagement, only hatred and abuse.

But in the case of boxing, what else does one expect? Amir Khan himself, writing in his autobiography, describes the constant abuse and hatred directed at him for being a Muslim. The sort of person who shrieks hatred at others usually shrieks it his own family after he has exhausted himself on an enemy. That’s why fanatics don’t care who they kill. Absolutism, be it Fascist or Marxist, has no room for moderation or exchange.

That this is true of the intellectual world comes as a disappointment, but that it is true of boxing is no surprise at all. So for Salita to express shock is to criticize his handlers and trainers for not preparing him. And for him to use it as an excuse is lame. As Tyson said in his film, it was precisely the bullying and the hatred he was subjected to that made him the fighter he was. Perhaps Salita is just too nice a Jewish boy and would not have made it onto Judah Maccabee’s elite fighting corps!

9 thoughts on “Boxing

  1. The article in The Forward says that Yuri Foreman's Judaism is a non-issue for fans. And Salita fought (and won) 31 bouts previously without encountering hatred. It wasn't until he fought abroad that he had this experience.

    So I am wondering whether shouting anti-Semitic slurs is not a boxing thing so much as an English/European thing? If so, perhaps it is not his trainers' fault, as it would have been just as unexpected for them, unless they have worked outside of the US before.


  2. Do you think perhaps that as history is written by the victors (we remember Judah but not Jason) so too, literate Jews recorded more about their bookish endeavours than the exploits of Jewish boxers? In the East End, fighting Mosley's supporters and boxing for prize money in pubs was once part of the same, admittedly illegal, picture. My grandfather was one of these boxers.

  3. I attended the Salita fight, and thought I would take the opportunity to set the record straight.

    There's no doubt that the crowd was overwhelmingly in favour of Amir Kahn, however the Muslim following was small. The audience was largely working class NE England White.

    At no point did I or anyone else I spoke to who attended the fight see or hear either directed personally or Salita directed, anything resembling anti-Semitism. There were many Yidden there with beards & kippot who concur.

    After the fight, stunned, I went ring side. There were about 30 Pakistani followers dancing, and a further 100 or so Pakistani followers at the top of the stand nearest the ring dancing to a drum beat. The rare Allah hu Akbar was shouted, but I would not deem that anti-Semitic. Had Salita won, I would have been belting out Haveinu Shalom Alekhem!

    Later that evening Salita's manager told me that the boxers had to walk to the ring through a narrow aisle and Salita faced verbal abuse at that point & physical contact from Kahn fans. At no point was anti-Semitism sited!

    There could be several reasons why Salita lost so dramatically, but blaming anti-Semitism is disingenuous.

  4. I am really pleased that Anon has left this post. It just confims how one needs to treat what is written in the press with suspicion. I am delighted to have the record put straight. Of course, it doesn't change my opinion about boxing or mob attitudes in Europe!

  5. Dear Rabbi Rosen,

    I fully concur with your views on boxing. However any involvement in secular activity which compromises a Jew as a Jew, for example acting and other forms of entertainment, can also be regarded as a chilil Hashem. As a Rov said in a shiur once, " Anyone who Hashem wants to humiliate turns him into an entertainer". What is your view on other aspects of entertainment or entertainers including, actors, comedians such as Woody Allen or Jackie Mason or Lilly Tomlin or other Jews who represent "us" in these spheres?

  6. Anonblog:

    What a Jew does for parnassa is a complex question, and of course showbusiness is not a profession a Jew who wants to keep mitzvot will go into. On the other hand, in political terms it can be useful to have popular or well connected Jews in high places (think of Queen Esther–the Harem was not a place for nice Jewish girls) and having successful public figures supporting Jewish pride can be beneficial.

    Having said that, I resent having people like Woody Allen or Philip Roth, who in no way live a Jewish life or represent Jewish values, constantly referred to as representatives of Jews or Judaism (in the same way that I resent crooked financiers being taken as examples of Jewish life or publicity mad entertainment rabbis as examples of Jewish spirituality).

Comments are closed.