General Topics

British Mandate


Whether it is in drama, journalism, or academia, there are always subjective and different ways of examining historical events. A new Channel 4 series The Promise, by Peter Kosminsky, illustrates once again the deception and dishonesty of presenting only one side of a story. The series purports to objectively illustrate how so many British soldiers, seeing at first hand in Europe the result of what the Germans perpetrated against the Jews, came to Palestine to serve in the British Mandate Army, imbued with a pro-Jewish feeling, a sense that the Jews deserved a refuge–but the actions of the wicked Zionists turned them against the Jews and left them feeling completely on the Arab side. So here is another point of view. And if you doubt my objectivity I refer you to Conor Cruise O’Brien’s The Siege for a disinterested perspective.

When I first went to Israel as a teenager in 1956, I remember vividly how surprised I was when I encountered so much ill feeling and resentment towards the British Mandate. I was made to feel that being British was an embarrassment.

It is not as though I did not know about the history of the British Mandate. Britain had captured the Middle East from the Turks in the First World War. The Balfour Declaration had promised a homeland for the Jews in their ancestral lands, but the interests of the Arab population had to be preserved. When Britain was granted the mandate in 1922, the first High Commissioner, Sir Herbert Samuel, a Jew, succeeded in alienating everyone. It was an impossible situation.

The Ottoman Empire had welcomed Jews ever since their expulsion from Spain. However, as anti-Semitism grew in Europe during the late 19th and early 20th centuries and Jewish immigration began to increase, tensions rose. Initially some Arab leaders welcomed the influx and its promise of joint development. Emir Feisal (son of the King of Hejaz) and Chaim Weizmann (later president of the World Zionist Organization) signed an agreement in 1919 to work together to achieve common goals. It was, sadly, short-lived.

Originally the plan was for the whole of Palestine and Transjordan to be divided between Arabs and Jews. But the British began to play the old game of Divide and Rule, hiving off Transjordan and sending army officer Sir John Glubb to establish and train the Arab Legion. The rise of Arab nationalism led to riots, attacks on civilians, and the notorious Hebron massacre of Jews in 1929. The British felt they had to appease the Arabs, so they began to restrict Jewish immigration. The White Paper of 1939 virtually closed the door on Jewish immigration precisely at the moment when a haven might have saved hundreds of thousands from the Nazi barbarity.

Those who did manage escape Europe had to face harsh detention camps in Atlit, and then Cyprus. Refugee ships were sent back to Europe or redirected to Cyprus or Mauritius. The British army and police force became notorious for their harsh and humiliating treatment of Jews. Indeed, the Board of Deputies had evidence that many of the volunteers who went to Palestine had anti-Semitic records. Still, the main Jewish community under Ben Gurion, despite his disgust at British policy, was committed to cooperation with the Mandate forces and participating in the war effort. He famously said, “We will fight the White Paper as if there is no war, and fight the war as if there is no White Paper.” But as diplomacy was not working, extreme Jewish groups such as Etzel (Irgun) and Lehi (Stern Gang) began to initiate campaigns of violence against British military and Arab targets. The first member of a Jewish underground group, Shlomo Ben-Yosef, was executed in 1938, but no further executions of Jews were held in Palestine until after the war when they resumed their campaigns.

In 1945 the Mandate enacted the Defense (Emergency) Regulations which suspended Habeas Corpus, established military courts, and prescribed the death penalty for carrying weapons or ammunition illegally and for membership in illegal organizations. The post-war foreign secretary of the Labour government was the notorious Ernest Bevin, who was adamantly opposed to the idea of a Jewish state. Richard Crossman believed he was profoundly anti-Semitic. He pushed the Mandate authorities to take a very hard line.

In 1946 Michael Eshbal and Yosef Simchon were arrested and sentenced to death. The Irgun began a policy of reprisals. Five days later they kidnapped five British officers in Tel Aviv, and another one the following day in Jerusalem. Two weeks later, when Eshbal’s and Simchon’s sentences were commuted to life imprisonment, the officers were released.

In January 1947, another Irgun militant, Dov Gruner, was sentenced to death. On January 26, two days before Gruner’s scheduled execution, Irgun kidnapped a British intelligence and the president of the district court of Tel Aviv. Sixteen hours before the scheduled execution, the British forces commander announced an “indefinite delay” of the sentence, and Irgun released its hostages.

On April 16, 1947, Gruner and three other militants, Yehiel Dresner, Mordechai Alkahi and Eliezer Kashani, were executed. In May 1947, forty-one prisoners broke out from Acre Prison. Six of them were killed and seven others were rearrested. Among the organizers, Avshalom Haviv, Yaakov Weiss and Meir Nakar were tried by a military court and sentenced to death.

The Irgun retaliated by capturing two British soldiers and announced that if their men were put to death they would do the same to the British soldiers. The High Commissioner Alan Cunningham gave the order and the Irgun men were executed. The day afterwards the bodies of the two British soldiers were discovered hanging from olive trees. The Irgun admitted to the killings.

There were other acts of Jewish terror, but this was the one act that Britain never forgave the Jews for. The British press attacked the Zionists. The Board of Deputies of British Jews issued a full condemnation. So did the Jewish community in Israel. Ben Gurion had been resolutely against violence or terror. Indeed, the Haganah had been working with the British forces to find the captured British soldiers. But the endemic anti-Semitism of much of British society exploded.

It is argued in their defense that the campaigns of the Lehi and Stern Gang contributed as much as anything else to Britain’s giving up on Palestine. She ceded responsibility to the UN, which voted for partition. But the Arabs rejected the compromise and declared war. Behind the scenes Bevin plotted with the Jordanians and also negotiated “the Portsmouth Treaty” with Iraq (signed on January 15, 1948), with the British undertaking to withdraw from Palestine in such a fashion as to provide for swift Arab occupation of all its territory to destroy the Jewish state. As the British withdrew they handed over as much of their hardware as they could to the Arabs. The ill feeling with the Foreign Office has festered to this day, which is why the Queen has never been allowed a formal visit to Israel.

So it may well be that Sabra arrogance and triumphalism alienated British soldiers and policemen working in Palestine. But my goodness me, they and their masters did more than enough to deserve it. Two wrongs do not make a right of course, but there are two sides to every story.

16 thoughts on “British Mandate

  1. How right you are, Jeremy. The pity of it is that this programme was made by yet another British Jew who feels he has to bend over backwards to placate public opinion and in doing so distorts the truth.

    Good Shabbos from Israel.

  2. Brilliant Jeremy, thank you. Very informative and very necessary for people to know these crucial historical facts. I was recently in the UK for a few weeks and saw one episode of The Promise. The bias is as obvious as a Peace Now logo. Shame really – a wasted opportunity to educate people in a balanced way.

    Shabbat shalom from Yerushalyim.

  3. a) while correct on "in Palestine" as regards no hangings of Jews after Ben-Yosef, the Two Eliyahus who assassinated Lord Moyne were hanged but in Egypt.

    b) you are unique in leaving out the King David Hotel operation.

    c) and yes, the Irgun and Lechi campaign was crucial, as the British admitted in their 1948 Whie Paper ( "84,000 troops, who received no cooperation from the Jewish community, had proved insufficient to maintain law and order in the face of a campaign of terrorism waged by highly organized Jewish forces equipped with all the weapons of the modern infantryman. Since the war, 338 British subjects had been killed in Palestine, while the military forces there had cost the British taxpayer 100 million pounds. The renewal of Arab violence on the announcement of the United Nations decision to partition Palestine and the declared intentions of Jewish extremists showed that the loss of further British lives was inevitable. It was equally clear that, in view of His Majesty's Government's decision not to enforce the partition of Palestine against the declared wishes of the majority of it inhabitants…"

  4. Thanks David and Chodesh Tov to you.
    I doubt if when the Megilla says 'VEnaHafochu' it was referring to Egypt and Libya but you never know!!!!

  5. YMedad:
    Thanks for putting me right. I included the King David attack under 'other operations' but actually I should have mentioned specifically it because the British response to the warning phone call was 'We dont take instructions from Jews.'

  6. I also received the following important comment:

    I read and enjoyed your article. But one important correction: “The Promise” is a Channel 4 production, not BBC. It’s relevant because C4 was supposed to shake everything up and renew British TV but some of us say on this topic it’s more of the same. The promise is longer than four feature films. So transmitted on four successive Sundays we have just had a month long festival of anti-Zionism here on prime time British TV.

    Please read my article in Standpoint magazine. My review attacking “The Promise” for its dishonest historiography has just been published online by Standpoint Magazine here:

    Links to my article are currently on the front page.

    The full piece can be found at

    I hope you enjoy reading it.

    Please pass on the link because it’s important not just to write these things but also get them read.

    Kind regards,

    Daniel Eilon
    Consultant Solicitor

  7. Important to understand that within all the groups present during this conflict there were good people and bad people. The leadership were, by and large, able to dialogue with one another. Even the infamous Mufti could engage with his erstwhile foes, sometimes. Surprising as this may seem.

    The problems were further down the feeding chain. There were some seriously extreme people in Palestine and they, like all extremists, sought to create situations that would steer the moderate masses towards their argument. They could be ruthless in achieving that end.

    The people had individual histories too. Some of those present had fought the British in the Great War and thus, vice versa. This was hardly likely to foster the sense of commonality that would be inherent to a thriving colonial set-up. Had the early Zionists been comprised of Brits then it might have worked better; but Germans, Russians and Poles, well I ask you!

    Anyway, your article above seems to be one of the better written that I have seen on the subject, given the scope of the historical matter, you seem to have got much in.

    ps. Note to YMedad – number of British soldiers killed in Palestine 1945-48 was 914, full details here:

  8. Anonymous:
    Yes sadly in every situation I can think of there are extremists and the Jews were no different though it must be admitted that the vast and overwhelming majority did not support the Irgun etc and interestingly colonials all learnt that making life hell for the Brits was the only way to get them out, Cyprus, Kenya, India etc etc Ironically it redounds to the good in the Brits that unlike primitive dictators like Khameni, GaDuffy, the Burmese and the Chinese, the Brits were reluctant ( after Amritsar) to mow down innocent civilians.

  9. To Anon 5:01 – First of all, thanks for that site. Here's this site of the police. Second, I quoted the official British count as of May 15, 1948 in a White paper so your problem is with HMG, not me.

  10. Rabbi:
    Thank you for the courtesy of your reply. Having got the Brits out, as you say, they then seem to have turned on one another. Ireland seems to have been the model followed by all – which sparks a wry smile amongst those of us familiar with the ongoing problems over there.

  11. Please note that in response to Daniel Eilon's comment, the reference in the blog post has been corrected to read "Channel 4", rather than "BBC".


  12. I'm coming very late to the party, as it were. I just want to point out that the 914 is the number of nearly every death, combat and non-combat.

    You take a force that peaked at 100,000 and had many young conscripts in from 1946. The number of soldiers killed was 233 according to the MoD roll of honour, and police around 120. They were a lot of things that made it hazardous – two typhus outbreaks, a spell of plague, 20+ resturants closed down due to bad hygeine which troops frequented, road accidents (in one incident, 13 soldiers were killed), drowning, natural causes, training mishaps and guns misfiring, very common with the sten gun. As you can see, the May 1948 report says 338 killed including British subjects such as the 12 in the King David bombing.

    While deaths did intensify, nearly 600 British subjects were not killed in the last six months. If you look at today's war in Afghanistan, nearly 100 deaths have been non-combat. In Malaya from 1948-60, more soldiers died through illness than combat and the same was the case in Palestine.

  13. Never too late to come to a party Anon!
    Thanks for your comments about nuber of deaths. Anything tht helps towards a clearer understanding of the situation is always helpful.
    In this vein I should have added the issue of the Colonial Police Force, a notoriously undrerpaid, unprofessional collection of unsuitable men, often described as the dregs of the Empire, who caused as much ill feeling and resentment as the army.

  14. What a lot of rubbish Organished jewish terrorist attacks more like cowards Go get Eric Lowe's book Foggotten Conscrits The true story

Comments are closed.