General Topics

Do non-Jews have souls?


A recent exchange from JROD:

QUESTION:  Jeremy, I’ve always been uncomfortable with the notion of Jews having a “higher” level of Neshama than non-Jews. I was wondering what variety of opinions we have on this in our tradition and, in fact, how a neshama is defined.

RESPONSE:  Hey this is heavy duty stuff and an excellent example of an issue that has lots of different answers but by and large divides between rationalist and mystics.

The words used in the Bible to describe the soul–ruach, nefesh and neshama–are all used of humans and animals.

Ecclesiastes (Kohelet) 3.19. says, “There is one spirit (ruach) to all creatures. Who knows if the spirit of man rises and the spirit of animals descends? Everything goes to the same place!”

According to Greek philosophy there are two eternal substances, “matter” and “mind”, and humans are made up of both. Around 2000 years ago “mind” came to be associated by Jewish philosophers with “soul”.

The Midrash adds two other words, ot and yechida. The Midrash gives a range of different ideas trying to define or delineate them, but all within the rather non-rational and non-systematic approach that characterizes the Midrashic method.

You need to look to Maimonides on the one hand, and the Zohar on the other to see how the ideas of soul have developed.

According to Maimonides (Hilchot Teshuva) our souls are, indeed, our intellects, the vehicle for understanding and connecting with God. If we develop our minds to think of God they will survive us after death and return to unite with God (based on Aristotelian thought). And this is what is meant by “Heaven” or Gan Eden. But we can obliterate it through neglect, and when we die that is all there is. And that is what the rabbis meant when they talk about “Geyhinnom” or “Hell”. According to Maimonides only humans have souls.

The Zohar distinguishes between an animal soul and a Divine soul. Divine souls are made of a special Divine substance and there is a limited amount. Soul material is what sustains spiritual beings, Jews, and is constantly recycled to ensure that such human beings are helped to elevate their bodies. There is some disagreement in mystical circles as to whether only Jews have such souls or whether other spiritual people do, too.

Lubavitch, for example, drawing on Zohar sources, believes only Jews do and any convert must have received his or her soul from an earlier Jewish source (this is an opinion that does not make sense to my limited mental or spiritual capacities).

To complicate matters, we say every day in the “Modeh Ani” prayer that we thank God for returning our souls when we wake up, which implies that soul has something to do with consciousness.

Philosophy has now discarded the mind/body division (beautifully demolished for a popular audience in Koestler‘s The Ghost in the Machine). It does not make sense to talk about Mind as if it were some non-physical substance. After all, cut off the oxygen or blood and it stops functioning.

So we would need to talk about soul as that faculty or sense through which we recognize, appreciate, sense the Divine. But that still places it in a quasi-physical context.

We could go down a variety of Spinoza’s Pantheism and talk about an instinctive association with the universe, something close to Buddhism. But Judaism is a transcendental religion, which means there has to be a personal engagement with God. And this is why I favor the “sense” theory.

But I also like mysticism, and mysticism is, to me, poetic. So the passionate love between a human and God is something one experiences and engages with on a visceral, non-cognitive, poetical level. It’s like abandoning oneself to love, very often in a way one neither understands nor is conscious of, or of what mechanism is being used. “Intoxicated with God” is the expression often used of mystics. Allowing oneself to let go of logic is also a recognition of one’s limitations, and possibly of areas of ones brain that are still uncharted.

There is no actual command or even Maimonidean dogma attached to soul, specifically, though in practice there is no way to understand life after death without some notion of soul. Therefore it is up to the individual to come to his or her own conclusion and decide what theory or approach suits them personally.

I find it a great strength of Judaism that we do not have too rigid a theological system and there is such room for variations and personal input, given, of course, our brains differ in style and depth of function.

FOLLOW-UP QUESTION:  So, from what you are saying, the logic of the Rambam would lead me to conclude that anyone (Jewish or not) can potentially reach the same levels (spiritually). If one were to take the view of the Zohar and interpretations following, then there are levels of spirituality, which apply to Jews, non-Jew, animals, etc?

RESPONSE:  Most definitely, according to Maimonides, non-Jews as well as Jews are capable of the ultimate spirituality that gives them “a place in the world to come”. Indeed, the Talmud says this quite specifically (Sanhedrin 105a). What’s more, the Talmud also says that both Jewish and non-Jewish communities are sustained by the presence in each of good, caring “pious people”.

It is only in Kabbalah that you find this idea I equally find repulsive that only Jews have Divine souls but everyone else only has animal souls (including, of course, animals–philosopher Peter Singer please note!).

However, given that this idea emerged at a time when Jews were being massacred, raped and burnt to death for their religious beliefs I can understand the historical context even if I don’t agree with it!

submit feedback

10 thoughts on “Do non-Jews have souls?

  1. In his book Kaballah: A Quest in Jewish Mysticism, David Ariel states the kaballistic belief that only Jewish have souls, and seemingly supports it by not giving any critical commentary. However, the quote he uses from the Zohar actually says that "those who study the Torah" receive a neshemah, which would seemingly then be open to Christians and Muslims. And if we interpret "Torah" more widely as "God's Revelation to Man," this can be opened up to other revelations in other faiths, Hindu, Buddhists, etc. I find it amazing that in a spiritual book of this kind no attempt was made to interpret these Zoharic passages differently– indeed, to give a kabbalistic reading of the kabbalah!

  2. It simply makes no sense at all to say non-Jews have no souls. The whole Biblical narrative pre-Abraham and pre-Sinai cannot be understood unless all of God's humans are created equally. This is the Talmudic position too.

    It is true some are able to reach higher levels of spirituality than others and Torah is supposed to be a kind of shortcut or direct line, but otherwise how to undertstand the Talmudic concept of The Pious of the Nations of the World? Besides, what about converts? The Kabbalists are constrained to come up with cockamamie theories about being descended from the children who suckled at Sarah's breasts. Well, each according to his own, I say!

    Yes, I know Kabbalah has the idea of an Animal Soul as opposed to a Divine Soul which only Jews have and Lubavitch are keen on that one but that is mystical fancy not logic. Kabbalah believes you can never obliterate the soul, whereas Maimonides says you can. One is not bound to adopt all the ideas of Kabbalah, such as transmigration of souls or this one, though I have heard some claim so. In which case one can treat the Torah allegorically! They want to have their cake and eat it, which is fine, but you can hardly make that an obligation on everyrone!

  3. In this post, you managed to dance all the way around the asker's question without truly answering it.

    That is very dishonest, and leads me to believe that the answer to the question posed in the post title, which you are so unwilling to give, is "yes."

    At least be willing to publicly own your beliefs, if you are determined to hold them.

  4. How weird that you read something I write and come to such a contrary conclusion. I'd have thought its blindingly obvious that I do believe all humans have a soul and that I believe both Jews and non-Jews can allow it to atrophy to the point of disappearance.

  5. G-d projects sparks (souls) from His own divine essence. The sparks are all a fractional and conditioned part of G-d’s divine essence imbued with a semblance of free will to turn G-dwards or to indulge the evil inclination. The manner in which the innate fractional and conditioned divinity of a spark is expressed creates a hierarchy of sparks or souls. By turning to HaShem, the Jewish soul ascends G-dwards; a person born Jewish has easier access to his soul’s divine essence as his ancestors priorly forged a link to the divine essence by worshipping HaShem down many generations and so the ancestral spiritual elevation gets inherited by succeeding generations provided they lead a Torah compliant lifestyle, whereas when one is born a Non-Jew and worships the deities of other religions then the soul goes towards that entity and consequently its inner divine essence gets choked and cloaked by the properties of the entity he worships. When a gentile turns to HaShem, his soul begins shaking off the cloud of ignorance and constriction caused by worshipping alien gods and gradually as his ardour for attaching himself to HaShem increases his soul sparkles with the divine light manifesting from within. His soul can now freely express the divine essence based on his aspiration and observance.

  6. Thank you for your comment. All such talk about Divine sparks Nitzotzot and Klipot is beautiful mystical theory. Mysticism and Rationalism are two very different ways of looking at life and reality. I was dealing with this issue purely on a rational level in this piece. So there is no point in trying to compare apples to oranges.

Comments are closed.